Cases6009004/2025

Claimant v Royal Free NHS Hospital

5 June 2025Before Employment Judge KlimovLondon Centralon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claim was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' continuous service, which is required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out despite being given the opportunity to do so.

Facts

The claimant was employed by Royal Free NHS Hospital for less than two years and brought a complaint of unfair dismissal. The judgment notes that other complaints brought by the claimant remain unaffected by this strike-out decision.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires not less than two years' continuous service to bring such a claim. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out despite being given the opportunity.

Practical note

Unfair dismissal claims require two years' continuous service unless the dismissal falls within an automatic unfair dismissal category, and claims lacking this jurisdictional requirement will be struck out at a preliminary stage.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6009004/2025
Decision date
5 June 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No