Cases6010748/2024

Claimant v Super-Max Limited

4 June 2025Before Employment Judge E P Morgan KCLondon Southin person

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£60,608

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found the claimant was not paid salary from 1 January 2024 to 14 August 2024. Despite the respondent alleging the claimant did not work full hours, the evidence showed she remained available and performed work as required. The respondent took no disciplinary action and the claimant was entitled to her contractual wages for the entire period.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The claimant was entitled to payment for 15.5 days (3.1 weeks) of accrued but untaken holiday calculated from her annual entitlement of 25 days as at the effective date of termination on 14 August 2024, having carried over 10 days from the previous year and taken 10 days in 2024. This was payable under both her contract and the Working Time Regulations 1998.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

By failing to pay the claimant for almost 8 months, the respondent was in fundamental and repudiatory breach of contract, entitling the claimant to resign and treat herself as constructively dismissed. She was therefore entitled to 12 weeks' notice pay. The respondent's allegation that she abused her position in November 2023 was rejected, and in any event that conduct had been waived by the respondent continuing her employment.

Facts

The claimant was a Vice President with 26 years' service who was not paid from January to August 2024 due to the respondent's financial difficulties after its Indian supplier shut down in September 2022. She continued to work and remain available during this period, taking holiday with agreement and attending weekly calls. After being told no further funding would be provided to the UK business, she resigned on 14 August 2024. The respondent alleged she had not worked full hours and had abused her position in November 2023 by paying herself but not a colleague.

Decision

The tribunal found the claimant had continued to work and remain available as required, rejecting the respondent's evidence that she had significantly reduced her working. The failure to pay for almost 8 months was a repudiatory breach entitling her to resign, and she was awarded arrears of wages (£41,286.67), accrued holiday pay (£3,966.70) and notice pay (£15,354.96), totalling £60,608.33 net. The tribunal also refused the respondent's application to take evidence by video link from witnesses in the UAE.

Practical note

A sustained failure to pay wages over many months will constitute a fundamental breach of contract entitling an employee to resign and claim constructive dismissal without working notice, even where the employer alleges the employee did not work full hours but took no disciplinary action at the time.

Award breakdown

Notice pay£15,355
Holiday pay£3,967
Arrears of pay£41,287

Legal authorities cited

Boston Deep Sea Fishing Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch.D. 339Agbabiaka (Evidence from Abroad, Nare Guidance) [2021] UKUT 286

Statutes

Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 13(17)ERA 1996 s.13(1)Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 14(6)ERA 1996 s.13(3)Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 13Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 13AWorking Time Regulations 1998 reg 14Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 13(16)

Case details

Case number
6010748/2024
Decision date
4 June 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Employment details

Role
Vice President
Service
26 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No