Cases1406173/2023

Claimant v Belgarum Property Management Limited

2 June 2025Before Employment Judge LevertonSouthamptonhybrid

Outcome

Partly successful£39,495

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(disability)failed

The tribunal found that the complaint of direct disability discrimination was not well-founded. The claimant did not establish that she was treated less favourably than a comparator without her disability would have been treated in similar circumstances.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)succeeded

The tribunal found the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was well-founded. The respondent subjected the claimant to unfavourable treatment linked to her disability, resulting in loss of sick pay in 2018 and 2019, and pension-related losses.

Facts

The claimant brought claims of direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability against her employer, a property management company. The claims related to treatment she received in 2018 and 2019, including loss of sick pay, and later pension-related losses in 2021. The claimant represented herself at a three-day hearing, while the respondent was represented by Peninsula Business Services.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the direct disability discrimination claim but upheld the claim for unfavourable treatment arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal awarded £39,495.11 comprising past financial losses (including lost sick pay and pension losses), injury to feelings of £20,000 in the middle Vento band, and substantial interest calculated over several years.

Practical note

Employers must be careful to distinguish between direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability, as the latter requires establishing unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of the disability, without the need for a comparator.

Award breakdown

Injury to feelings£20,000
Pension loss£2,632
Interest£12,004

Vento band: middle

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.15

Case details

Case number
1406173/2023
Decision date
2 June 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
No