Cases2500997/2024

Claimant v Pass N Go Driving School Limited

28 May 2025Before Employment Judge L RobertsonNewcastlein person

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£13,127

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)succeeded

The tribunal found in the claimant's favour on disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. This is a remedy hearing following a liability judgment, indicating the claim succeeded at the liability stage.

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal awarded compensation for unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996, including a basic award and compensatory award, indicating the unfair dismissal claim succeeded at the liability stage.

Facts

This is a remedy hearing following a liability judgment in favour of Mrs Burnett against Pass N Go Driving School Limited. The tribunal had previously found that the respondent unlawfully discriminated against the claimant on grounds of disability and unfairly dismissed her. The remedy hearing was convened to determine the appropriate level of compensation for these successful claims.

Decision

The tribunal awarded a total of £13,127.07 in compensation. For disability discrimination, the claimant was awarded £8,500 for injury to feelings plus interest of £873.75 (469 days at 8% per year). For unfair dismissal, she received a basic award of £3,253.32 and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The Recoupment Regulations do not apply.

Practical note

A driving school was ordered to pay over £13,000 in compensation for disability discrimination and unfair dismissal, with the injury to feelings award falling in the lower Vento band.

Award breakdown

Basic award£3,253
Compensatory award£500
Injury to feelings£8,500
Loss of statutory rights£500
Interest£874

Vento band: lower

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010Employment Rights Act 1996

Case details

Case number
2500997/2024
Decision date
28 May 2025
Hearing type
remedy
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
No