Claimant v Doris Engineering UK Limited

All complaints of failure to pay holiday pay were withdrawn by the claimants, except that of Mr Connolly which was not dismissed.

All complaints of failure to pay other payments were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed upon withdrawal.

Mr Ujjan's complaint that he was unfairly dismissed because he made a protected disclosure was withdrawn and dismissed upon withdrawal.

Mr Noufal's whistleblowing complaint against the first respondent in Case No. 2305926/2024 was withdrawn, on the basis that he had brought the same complaint in Case No. 2305934/2024 which remains active.

The unfair dismissal claims of Mr Noufal, Mr Ujjan, Mr Lainchbury and Mr Kelly were struck out because they had not been continuously employed by the first respondent for a period of not less than 2 years, and therefore lacked the qualifying service required under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The automatically unfair dismissal claims pursuant to regulation 7 TUPE 2006 of Mr Noufal, Mr Ujjan, Mr Lainchbury and Mr Kelly were struck out for lack of two years' continuous employment with the first respondent.

The claims for redundancy payment brought by Mr Noufal, Mr Ujjan, Mr Lainchbury and Mr Kelly under s.163 ERA 1996 were struck out because they did not have the required two years' continuous employment with the first respondent.