Claimant v Pinnacle Finance and Property Group Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The respondent failed to present an ET3 response to the claim. Under Rule 21, the tribunal accepted the claimant's claim for unpaid salary and commission as well founded. The claim covered the period 23 September 2024 to 29 November 2024.
Facts
Mrs Murphy claimed unpaid salary and commission from Pinnacle Finance and Property Group Ltd covering the period 23 September 2024 to 29 November 2024. The respondent failed to present an ET3 response to defend the claim.
Decision
The tribunal issued a default judgment under Rule 21 in favour of the claimant as the respondent had not presented a response. The tribunal found the claim well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £15,415.57 gross for unpaid salary and commission.
Practical note
Employers who fail to submit an ET3 response risk default judgment being entered against them, even for substantial claims involving salary and commission arrears.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6000667/2025
- Decision date
- 27 May 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- financial services
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No