Claimant v Dexters London Limited

Both respondents applied to strike out the TUPE regulation 13 failure to consult claim on grounds of no reasonable prospects of success, and for deposit orders on grounds of little reasonable prospects. The tribunal refused both the strike-out applications and the deposit order applications, allowing the claim to proceed.

Second respondent applied to strike out the disability harassment claim under s.26 Equality Act 2010 on grounds the tribunal had no jurisdiction and no reasonable prospects of success, and applied for a deposit order. The tribunal refused both applications, allowing the claim to proceed.

Claimant applied to amend to add a wrongful dismissal claim. The tribunal refused the amendment on the basis that it was reasonably practicable to bring this claim within the primary limitation period, meaning the claim was out of time and could not be added.