Cases3313116/2023

Claimant v Securitas Security Services (UK) Ltd

23 May 2025Before Employment Judge A. TinnionNewcastleremote video

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Whistleblowingpartly succeeded

This was a preliminary hearing on the respondent's strike-out application. The tribunal struck out certain alleged protected disclosures (specifically vague statements like 'things went too far' and 'things were getting worse') and one detriment allegation on grounds that the claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing them. Other parts of the whistleblowing claim appear to continue.

Detrimentpartly succeeded

The respondent applied to strike out detriment allegations. The tribunal struck out Detriment #4 on the basis the claimant had no reasonable prospect of showing it was a detriment suffered on the ground of protected disclosures. Other detriment allegations appear to remain.

Facts

The claimant brought whistleblowing claims against his security services employer. The respondent applied at a preliminary hearing to strike out certain alleged protected disclosures and detriment allegations on grounds the claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing them. The tribunal partially granted the application, striking out vague statements within Protected Disclosures #2 and #3 and removing Detriment #4 entirely.

Decision

The tribunal struck out specific parts of the claimant's whistleblowing claim under Rule 38(a) where allegations were too vague or had no reasonable prospect of success. Parts of Protected Disclosures #2 and #3 and the entirety of Detriment #4 were removed, but other aspects of the claim appear to survive for future hearing.

Practical note

In whistleblowing claims, vague or conclusory statements like 'things went too far' will not satisfy the requirements for protected disclosures and may be struck out at a preliminary stage for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Legal authorities cited

Case details

Case number
3313116/2023
Decision date
23 May 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor