Cases3305281/2024

Claimant v K Wilby & Son Limited

23 May 2025Before Employment Judge Grahame AndersonBury St Edmundsremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£29,447

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

Rule 21 judgment entered in favour of the claimant after the respondent's application to extend time to present a response was refused. Tribunal awarded basic and compensatory awards for unfair dismissal.

Wrongful Dismissalsucceeded

Claim succeeded under the Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994. However, no separate notice pay was awarded to avoid double recovery, as losses were compensated within the compensatory award.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

Claim of unauthorised deduction from wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. Tribunal awarded £1,324.40 for unlawfully deducted wages.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

Claim for failure to provide written particulars of employment under s.38 Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. Tribunal awarded four weeks' pay (£2,442.00) as a statutory uplift.

Facts

The claimant, Mr. I. Rush, brought claims against his former employer K Wilby & Son Limited for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, unauthorised deduction from wages, and failure to provide written particulars of employment. The respondent applied under rule 21 of the ET Rules 2024 to extend time to present a response to the claim. Both parties were represented by counsel at a remote video hearing.

Decision

The tribunal refused the respondent's application to extend time and entered a rule 21 judgment in favour of the claimant. All four claims succeeded, with a total award of £29,446.98 comprising basic and compensatory awards for unfair dismissal, unlawfully deducted wages, and an uplift for failure to provide written particulars. No separate notice pay was awarded to avoid double recovery.

Practical note

Where a respondent fails to present a timely response and their extension application is refused, a rule 21 default judgment will typically succeed across all claims, though tribunals must still avoid double recovery between compensatory awards and notice pay.

Award breakdown

Basic award£14,957
Compensatory award£10,723
Unpaid wages£1,324

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994ERA 1996 s.94ET Rules 2024 r.21ERA 1996 s.13ERA 1996 s.38

Case details

Case number
3305281/2024
Decision date
23 May 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
1
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister