Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out under Rule 38(1)(c) and (d) because the Claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders dated 27th August 2024, did not respond to Employment Judge Lumby's strike-out warning, and was not actively pursuing her claim.
Facts
Ms Aksoy brought claims against DNATA Limited. On 27th August 2024, Employment Judge Sudra made case management orders with which the Claimant failed to comply. Employment Judge Lumby subsequently issued a strike-out warning. The Claimant failed to respond to this warning and did not comply with the orders.
Decision
The tribunal struck out all of the Claimant's claims under Rule 38(1)(c) and (d) because she failed to comply with tribunal orders and was not actively pursuing her claim. The Final Hearing scheduled for 3rd to 6th June 2025 was vacated.
Practical note
Claimants must comply with case management orders and actively pursue their claims or risk having them struck out without a hearing on the merits.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2306204/2023
- Decision date
- 23 May 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Name
- DNATA Limited
- Sector
- transport
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No