Claimant v MN Lyceom Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard evidence over five days and unanimously determined that the dismissal was fair. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal unanimously found that the claimant had not established disability discrimination. The tribunal heard full evidence including from an interpreter and rejected the claim.
The tribunal unanimously determined that the claimant was not entitled to statutory redundancy pay following consideration of the evidence presented over the five-day hearing.
Facts
Mr Mehboob brought claims against his former employer MN Lyceom Ltd for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, and statutory redundancy pay. The case was heard over five days via video link with the assistance of an interpreter. The claimant was represented by his wife, while the respondent was represented by an advocate. The tribunal heard full evidence from both parties.
Decision
The tribunal unanimously dismissed all three claims. The tribunal found that the dismissal was fair, that disability discrimination was not established, and that the claimant was not entitled to statutory redundancy pay. Full reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Practical note
A five-day hearing with an interpreter resulted in complete rejection of claims for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, and redundancy pay, with the tribunal giving detailed oral reasons for its unanimous decision.
Case details
- Case number
- 6001367/2023
- Decision date
- 23 May 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 5
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- MN Lyceom Ltd
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep