Cases6003165/2025

Claimant v Jousters Childcare Ltd

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant had less than two years continuous service as required by Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint as the claimant lacked the statutory qualifying period and failed to give an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.

Facts

Mrs Marsden was employed by Jousters Childcare Ltd and brought an unfair dismissal complaint. She had less than two years continuous service with the respondent. The judgment notes that other complaints brought by the claimant were not affected by this strike-out, suggesting she had brought multiple claims.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant did not meet the statutory minimum two-year qualifying period required under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was given an opportunity to provide a reason why the complaint should not be struck out but failed to give an acceptable reason.

Practical note

Unfair dismissal claims require two years continuous service unless the dismissal falls within an automatically unfair category, and tribunals will strike out claims lacking jurisdiction at preliminary stage.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6003165/2025
Decision date
20 May 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No