Cases2406303/2023

Claimant v Hexagon Care Services Limited

20 May 2025Before Employment Judge N BuzzardLiverpoolremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(disability)struck out

Claimant confirmed at hearing she did not pursue her dismissal as direct disability discrimination and no direct discrimination claim was pursued. All other discrimination allegations related to events on or before November 2022 and were significantly out of time with no reasonable prospect of establishing a continuing act or securing a just and equitable extension.

Harassment(disability)struck out

All harassment allegations related to events on or before November 2022 (except one in February 2023 not included in first claim form). Tribunal found no reasonable prospect of establishing a continuing act linking these events, and no reasonable prospect of being granted extension of time due to length of delay, lack of persuasive explanation, prejudice to respondent from faded witness recollections, and claimant's failure to include most recent allegation in first claim.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)withdrawn

Employment Judge Horne refused claimant's application to amend to include reasonable adjustments claim in August 2024. Subsequently dismissed on withdrawal at hearing before Employment Judge Shotter on 5 March 2025. Claimant's later attempt to reinstate was refused as withdrawal is final and interests of justice require finality in litigation.

Unfair Dismissalnot determined

Respondent's strike-out application refused. There was a genuine dispute of fact regarding effective date of termination which, if resolved in claimant's favour, would bring claim in time. Respondent's alternative argument that claimant had previously withdrawn unfair dismissal claim was rejected as previous claim was made and withdrawn in error before any dismissal occurred. Claim proceeding to full hearing.

Facts

Claimant brought claims of disability discrimination (direct discrimination and harassment) and unfair dismissal following her dismissal. Most discrimination allegations related to events between August and November 2022. She submitted first claim in June 2023 and second claim in April 2024. She had previously engaged in grievance process in November 2022 to January 2023 with trade union representation. Respondent applied to strike out all claims on time limit grounds.

Decision

Tribunal struck out all Equality Act 2010 claims finding claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing claims were in time or securing necessary just and equitable extensions. Key factors included significant delays (over a year for some claims), lack of persuasive explanation, prejudice to respondent from faded recollections, no continuing act linking events, and claimant's failure to include most recent allegation in first claim. Unfair dismissal claim allowed to proceed due to genuine dispute over effective date of termination.

Practical note

Even with health issues and unrepresented status, claimants face strict time limits in discrimination cases and must present all allegations promptly; significant unexplained delays with no continuing act and prejudice to witness recollections will lead to strike-out on jurisdictional grounds.

Legal authorities cited

Robertson v Bexley Community Centre [2003] IRLR 434Chandhok v Tirkey [2015] ICR 527Hawkins v Atex Group Ltd [2012] IRLR 807Aziz v FDA [2010] EWCA Civ 304Hendricks v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2003] ICR 530Keeble v British Coal Corporation [1997] IRLR 336

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Rule 38Equality Act 2010

Case details

Case number
2406303/2023
Decision date
20 May 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No