Claimant v Hexagon Care Services Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
Claimant confirmed at hearing she did not pursue her dismissal as direct disability discrimination and no direct discrimination claim was pursued. All other discrimination allegations related to events on or before November 2022 and were significantly out of time with no reasonable prospect of establishing a continuing act or securing a just and equitable extension.
All harassment allegations related to events on or before November 2022 (except one in February 2023 not included in first claim form). Tribunal found no reasonable prospect of establishing a continuing act linking these events, and no reasonable prospect of being granted extension of time due to length of delay, lack of persuasive explanation, prejudice to respondent from faded witness recollections, and claimant's failure to include most recent allegation in first claim.
Employment Judge Horne refused claimant's application to amend to include reasonable adjustments claim in August 2024. Subsequently dismissed on withdrawal at hearing before Employment Judge Shotter on 5 March 2025. Claimant's later attempt to reinstate was refused as withdrawal is final and interests of justice require finality in litigation.
Respondent's strike-out application refused. There was a genuine dispute of fact regarding effective date of termination which, if resolved in claimant's favour, would bring claim in time. Respondent's alternative argument that claimant had previously withdrawn unfair dismissal claim was rejected as previous claim was made and withdrawn in error before any dismissal occurred. Claim proceeding to full hearing.
Facts
Claimant brought claims of disability discrimination (direct discrimination and harassment) and unfair dismissal following her dismissal. Most discrimination allegations related to events between August and November 2022. She submitted first claim in June 2023 and second claim in April 2024. She had previously engaged in grievance process in November 2022 to January 2023 with trade union representation. Respondent applied to strike out all claims on time limit grounds.
Decision
Tribunal struck out all Equality Act 2010 claims finding claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing claims were in time or securing necessary just and equitable extensions. Key factors included significant delays (over a year for some claims), lack of persuasive explanation, prejudice to respondent from faded recollections, no continuing act linking events, and claimant's failure to include most recent allegation in first claim. Unfair dismissal claim allowed to proceed due to genuine dispute over effective date of termination.
Practical note
Even with health issues and unrepresented status, claimants face strict time limits in discrimination cases and must present all allegations promptly; significant unexplained delays with no continuing act and prejudice to witness recollections will lead to strike-out on jurisdictional grounds.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2406303/2023
- Decision date
- 20 May 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No