Claimant v Lamar Investment Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The claim was struck out under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. The claimant was self-represented and the case was struck out, indicating likely non-pursuit or failure to prosecute the claim.
Facts
Chung Shing Yuen brought a claim against Lamar Investment Limited. The case proceeded to a hearing on 19 May 2025 by video before Employment Judge O'Dempsey at Watford. The claimant represented himself and the respondent was represented by a director named Munir. No details of the underlying facts or employment relationship are provided in the judgment.
Decision
Employment Judge O'Dempsey struck out and dismissed the claimant's claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons were initially provided. The claim was dismissed in its entirety.
Practical note
Rule 38 strike-outs for self-represented claimants emphasize the importance of properly pursuing claims and complying with tribunal directions and procedures.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3304747/2024
- Decision date
- 19 May 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- financial services
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- in house
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No