Cases6004875/2024

Claimant v Aquesta Ltd

16 May 2025Before Employment Judge McAvoy NewnsEast Londonremote video

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the dismissal to be unfair. While the claimant contributed to her dismissal through blameworthy conduct (25% reduction) and unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code (10% reduction), the dismissal itself was procedurally or substantively unfair.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract. The claim for notice pay succeeded, indicating the respondent failed to provide proper notice or payment in lieu of notice.

Facts

This is a liability judgment where the claimant N Morokar brought claims for unfair dismissal and notice pay against Aquesta Ltd. The claimant represented herself while the respondent was represented by a consultant. The hearing took place remotely over three days in May 2025.

Decision

The tribunal found both the unfair dismissal and breach of contract claims well founded. However, the claimant's compensation will be reduced by 25% for contributory conduct and by a further 10% for unreasonably failing to comply with the ACAS Code. The claimant was also awarded notice pay.

Practical note

Even where dismissal is unfair, tribunals will make significant reductions to compensation where the claimant's own blameworthy conduct contributed to the dismissal and where they failed to follow ACAS procedures.

Adjustments

Contributory fault25%

The Claimant contributed to her dismissal by reason of her blameworthy conduct and it is just and equitable to reduce her basic award and compensatory award by 25%

ACAS reduction-10%

The Claimant unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. It was just and equitable to reduce the compensatory award by 10%

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures

Case details

Case number
6004875/2024
Decision date
16 May 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
No