Cases6016295/2024

Claimant v Country Style Foods

16 May 2025Before Employment Judge Singhon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

Claim struck out because the claimant had less than two years continuous service, which is the minimum qualifying period required under s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out despite being given the opportunity to do so.

Facts

The claimant H Sillah was employed by Country Style Foods for less than two years before being dismissed. The claimant brought a complaint of unfair dismissal. The tribunal struck out the claim on the basis that the claimant did not have the requisite qualifying service. The claimant was given an opportunity to provide reasons why the claim should not be struck out but failed to provide an acceptable reason.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim on the basis that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years continuous service to bring such a claim, and the claimant did not meet this requirement. The hearing listed for 13 June 2025 was vacated.

Practical note

An unfair dismissal claim will be struck out where the claimant has less than two years qualifying service and cannot provide an acceptable reason (such as automatic unfair dismissal) to proceed without it.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6016295/2024
Decision date
16 May 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No