Claimant v PAS Capital Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The respondent failed to present a response to the claim. The tribunal issued a default judgment under rule 22 on the available material, finding the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages for the period January to April 2025.
The respondent failed to present a response. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed without proper notice, awarding damages equivalent to 2 weeks' net pay under rule 22 default judgment.
The respondent failed to present a response. The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's accrued holiday entitlement and ordered payment under rule 22 default judgment.
Facts
The claimant brought claims for unauthorised deduction of wages for the period January to April 2025, notice pay, and unpaid holiday pay against PAS Capital Ltd. The respondent failed to present any response to the claim.
Decision
The Employment Judge issued a default judgment under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, awarding the claimant £10,666.68 for unpaid wages, £1,104.79 for notice pay, and £1,887.18 for holiday pay, totalling £13,658.65.
Practical note
Employers who fail to respond to tribunal claims face default judgments on the available material, with awards made without the opportunity to defend the allegations.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 8000715/2025
- Decision date
- 14 May 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Name
- PAS Capital Ltd
- Sector
- financial services
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No