Cases3202500/2023

Claimant v Thorpe Hall Leisure Limited

9 May 2025Before Employment Judge C LewisEast Londonremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£13,456

Individual claims

Wrongful Dismissalwithdrawn

Withdrawn by the claimant at the end of closing submissions.

Detrimentwithdrawn

Claim under s.10 Employment Relations Act 1999 for failure to allow right to accompaniment was withdrawn by the claimant at the end of closing submissions.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)failed

The tribunal found that while the claimant's inability to control her anger on 9 August 2023 arose from her disabilities (anxiety, depression, PCOS), her failure to acknowledge the seriousness of the incident and deflection of responsibility during the disciplinary hearing did not arise from her disabilities. The respondent justified the dismissal as a proportionate means of achieving the legitimate aims of preserving its reputation and not tolerating unprofessional conduct, as no lesser sanction would ensure similar conduct would not recur.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)succeeded

The tribunal found that the respondent applied a PCP of terminating for conduct without seeking medical evidence. This put the claimant at a substantial disadvantage as her conduct on 9 August and her abruptness on 18 August were contributed to by her disabilities. The respondent was on notice that the claimant had recently returned from sick leave for mental health reasons and was on medication. It would have been a reasonable adjustment to seek medical evidence before dismissing her. The tribunal found an 80% chance the claimant would still have been dismissed even with the adjustment.

Facts

The claimant, a commis chef with disabilities (anxiety, depression, PCOS), was dismissed after a loud argument with a colleague on 9 August 2023 in which she shouted and swore within earshot of guests at the respondent's four-star hotel and spa. At the disciplinary hearing on 18 August 2023, she minimised the seriousness of the incident, deflected blame onto the colleague, and showed little remorse. The respondent dismissed her without seeking medical evidence, despite being aware she had recently returned from mental health-related sick leave.

Decision

The tribunal found the s.15 claim failed because, while the claimant's inability to control her anger arose from her disabilities, her failure to acknowledge the seriousness of the incident did not, and dismissal was justified to preserve the respondent's reputation. However, the failure to make reasonable adjustments claim succeeded: the respondent should have sought medical evidence before dismissing her. The tribunal awarded compensation reduced by 80% to reflect the likelihood she would have been dismissed anyway.

Practical note

Employers who are aware an employee has mental health issues should seek medical evidence before dismissing for misconduct, even where the employee does not raise their condition as a mitigating factor, or risk a finding of failure to make reasonable adjustments.

Award breakdown

Compensatory award£1,108
Injury to feelings£11,000
Interest£1,348

Vento band: lower

Adjustments

Polkey reduction80%

The tribunal found an 80% chance the respondent would still have dismissed the claimant even if medical evidence had been obtained, as she continued to downplay the seriousness of her conduct and fail to take responsibility. Full losses awarded for 7 weeks; 20% of losses awarded thereafter.

Legal authorities cited

Chagger v Abbey National Plc [2010] ICR 397O'Donoghue v Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council [2001] IRLR 615 CAGomez v GlaxoSmithKline Services ET case no. 2353401/09

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.20Employment Relations Act 1999 s.10Equality Act 2010 s.21Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996Equality Act 2010 s.15

Case details

Case number
3202500/2023
Decision date
9 May 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Commis Chef
Service
9 months

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep