Cases2303160/2023

Claimant v Getronics Services UK Ltd

Outcome

Claimant fails

Facts

This is a reconsideration application by the claimant seeking to challenge a previous judgment refusing his earlier reconsideration application of an original judgment, which included a costs order against him. The claimant made two applications dated 28 July 2025 and 18 August 2025, challenging aspects of the costs assessment including hourly rates, bundle preparation costs, VAT treatment, and procedural matters relating to the hearing.

Decision

Employment Judge Tsamados refused the reconsideration application on the basis that there were no reasonable prospects of the original decision or the reconsidered decision being varied or revoked. The judge found that the claimant was largely re-arguing points already rejected, misquoting legal authorities, and failing to provide evidence to support his contentions. The judge confirmed that the summary assessment of costs was proper and that VAT is not recoverable from the paying party as a matter of caselaw.

Practical note

Repeated reconsideration applications re-arguing the same points without new evidence or legal basis will be refused under Rule 70(2) where there are no reasonable prospects of success.

Legal authorities cited

Yerrakalva v Barnsley MBC & Anor UKEAT/0231/10Yerrakalva v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council [2012] ICR 420

Case details

Case number
2303160/2023
Decision date
9 May 2025
Hearing type
reconsideration
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No