Cases6014787/2024

Claimant v Richard Language College

8 May 2025Before Employment Judge YallopSouthamptonremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£39,931

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The Respondent failed to pay the Claimant her salary for March, April, May, and June 2024. There was no written agreement authorising the withholding of wages and no prior written consent. The tribunal found this constituted a series of unauthorised deductions from wages under s.13 ERA 1996.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The Claimant's contract entitled her to 12 weeks' notice. She was dismissed with immediate effect on 27 June 2024 and was not given any notice or paid in lieu of notice, constituting a breach of contract.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The Respondent breached the Claimant's contract by failing to pay her for 21 days of holiday accrued but not taken in 2024 when her employment ended. She was contractually entitled to be paid in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday on termination.

Redundancy Paysucceeded

The tribunal was satisfied the dismissal was by reason of redundancy. The dismissal email referred to the company being struck off from Companies House, and the Claimant was aware of the Respondent's financial difficulties. Under s.163(2) ERA there is a presumption of redundancy which was not rebutted.

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The Claimant was unfairly dismissed under s.94 ERA. No process was followed in respect of her dismissal, and the Respondent provided no evidence that the decision to dismiss was substantively fair. The Respondent did not attend to defend the claim.

Facts

The Claimant worked for the Respondent, a language college, for nearly 15 years as Client Services Manager. Following the Covid-19 pandemic, the Respondent suffered severe financial difficulties, was evicted from premises, and failed to pay the Claimant's salary from March to June 2024. On 27 June 2024, the Claimant was informed by email that the company was being struck off and she was dismissed with immediate effect. She received no wages, notice pay, holiday pay, or redundancy payment. The Respondent did not attend the tribunal and had not responded to the claim.

Decision

The tribunal found all claims well-founded. The Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages, breached contract by failing to pay notice and holiday pay, and unfairly dismissed the Claimant without process. Awards totalled £39,930.70 including arrears of wages, notice pay, holiday pay, statutory redundancy payment, and a compensatory award for unfair dismissal. The tribunal proceeded in the Respondent's absence under rule 47, finding it in accordance with the overriding objective given the Respondent's previous non-engagement.

Practical note

Where a financially distressed employer fails to respond to a claim and does not attend, tribunals will proceed under rule 21/22 and make findings based on the claimant's uncontested evidence, often resulting in awards across multiple heads of claim.

Award breakdown

Compensatory award£10,299
Notice pay£6,525
Holiday pay£1,872
Arrears of pay£9,316
Redundancy pay£11,419
Loss of statutory rights£500

Award equivalent: 73.4 weeks' gross pay

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.162ERA 1996 s.13ERA 1996 s.163(2)ERA 1996 s.163ERA 1996 s.94ERA 1996 s.122(4)ERA 1996 s.123

Case details

Case number
6014787/2024
Decision date
8 May 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
1
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
No

Employment details

Role
Client Services Manager
Salary band
£25,000–£30,000
Service
14 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No