Cases2306560/2023

Claimant v Utopia Leisure Limited

7 May 2025Before Employment Judge E FowellCroydonremote video

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Victimisation(race)succeeded

The tribunal found that Mr Perry dismissed Miss Jesse on 27 October 2023 without holding a grievance meeting or proper probation review. The sudden change from extending her probation on 26 October to dismissing her the next day, coupled with his irritation at the discrimination allegation, meant the tribunal could not be satisfied the dismissal was not tainted by victimisation. The usual process was curtailed because she had raised race discrimination allegations.

Direct Discrimination(race)failed

The tribunal found no less favourable treatment compared to white colleagues. Many alleged incidents did not happen as described (e.g. being told to walk/talk like white colleagues, being accused of lying about GP appointment). The instructions about the relaxation room, being interrupted, cleaning duties, and feedback were appropriate management actions that would have applied equally to any employee regardless of race.

Harassment(race)failed

The tribunal rejected the harassment claims relating to shower cleaning and the GP appointment. The tribunal found the accusation about lying re GP appointment did not occur. Cleaning work was part of the job that all reception staff had to do on rotation; there was nothing intrinsically offensive about it and no basis to find it violated dignity or created a hostile environment.

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

Struck out because Miss Jesse had less than two years' service and therefore did not have the statutory right to claim ordinary unfair dismissal.

Facts

Miss Jesse, a black spa receptionist, worked at Rowhill Grange Hotel for approximately 2.5 months before dismissal during probation. She raised concerns about her line manager Ms Routley's management style, including instructions about the relaxation room, being interrupted with guests, and cleaning duties. On 4 October she had a probationary review with poor feedback, followed by meetings with senior management where she alleged race discrimination. After going off sick, she raised a formal grievance on 8 October. Mr Perry initially extended her probation on 26 October but dismissed her the very next day on 27 October without holding a grievance meeting.

Decision

The tribunal upheld the victimisation claim, finding that Mr Perry's sudden decision to dismiss Miss Jesse on 27 October without a proper grievance meeting or probation review was influenced by her allegations of race discrimination. However, the tribunal dismissed the race discrimination and harassment claims, finding the management actions were appropriate and would have applied equally to any employee. The unfair dismissal claim was struck out due to insufficient service.

Practical note

Employers must not short-circuit proper grievance and probation processes when an employee raises discrimination allegations, even if the employer believes the allegations are unfounded, as doing so can itself constitute victimisation.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.26Equality Act 2010 s.27Equality Act 2010 s.136Equality Act 2010 s.13

Case details

Case number
2306560/2023
Decision date
7 May 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Spa receptionist
Service
2 months

Claimant representation

Represented
No