Cases1602291/2023

Claimant v Royal Mail Group Limited

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£492

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal declared that the claimant suffered an unlawful deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay calculations which failed to include overtime payments. The respondent was ordered to pay the amount owed for those deductions.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The tribunal found that holiday pay received by the claimant was unlawfully calculated by not including reference to overtime worked. This resulted in an underpayment which was remedied by an award of £492.14.

Facts

The claimant was employed by Royal Mail Group Ltd and worked regular overtime. When calculating his holiday pay, the respondent failed to include reference to the overtime payments he had undertaken, resulting in an underpayment.

Decision

The tribunal declared that the claimant had suffered an unlawful deduction from wages under s.24 ERA 1996 because his holiday pay failed to include overtime. He was awarded £492.14 representing the shortfall. The scheduled final hearing was cancelled.

Practical note

Holiday pay calculations must include regular overtime payments, and failure to do so constitutes an unlawful deduction from wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Award breakdown

Holiday pay£492

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.24

Case details

Case number
1602291/2023
Decision date
7 May 2025
Hearing type
on papers
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No