Cases2413178/2023

Claimant v Manchester Airport Group Plc

7 May 2025Before Employment Judge Phil AllenManchesterremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. The tribunal determined that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.

Facts

Mr Geraghty brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Manchester Airport Group Plc. The case was heard remotely via CVP in Manchester. The claimant represented himself while the respondent was represented by counsel. Limited factual details are available as only the judgment and not the full reasons have been provided.

Decision

The tribunal found that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed the claim. The claimant was determined not to have been unfairly dismissed. Oral reasons were given at the hearing but written reasons were not automatically provided.

Practical note

A self-represented claimant's unfair dismissal claim against a major airport operator failed on the merits after a one-day remote hearing.

Case details

Case number
2413178/2023
Decision date
7 May 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No