Claimant v NHS North of England Commissioning Support Unit
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that offers of alternative employment (a temporary Band 8a role and a Band 7 role) were made before notice of dismissal was given, and therefore did not satisfy the statutory requirements under s141 ERA 1996. Even if they had been valid offers, the tribunal found they were not objectively suitable employment - the temporary Band 8a lacked permanence and the Band 7 represented a demotion with loss of status, prescribing ability, and career prospects. The claimant's refusal of both offers was reasonable in all the circumstances.
Facts
The claimant was a Band 8a specialist pharmacist working 0.6 FTE for the respondent NHS body. Following a restructure driven by budget cuts, her substantive role was deleted. She was offered a temporary Band 8a role for six months and a permanent Band 7 role (one band lower). She refused both offers: the temporary Band 8a lacked security and would lead to a Band 7 role after six months; the Band 7 was a demotion involving loss of prescribing work, reduced status, potential pension impacts, and significantly increased travel to Northumberland GP practices. She secured alternative employment and left on 26 July 2024. The respondent refused to pay her statutory redundancy payment.
Decision
The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to her statutory redundancy payment of £9,264.08. The offers of alternative employment were made before notice of dismissal and therefore did not satisfy s141 ERA 1996. Even if they had been valid offers, neither was objectively suitable and the claimant's refusal was reasonable. The tribunal declined to apply an ACAS Code reduction as the claimant's failure to grieve was not unreasonable in the circumstances and reduction would not be just and equitable.
Practical note
Offers of alternative employment must be made after notice of dismissal to count as valid statutory offers; a role one band lower in the NHS is not automatically suitable employment and tribunals will scrutinise actual differences in duties, status, location and career impact.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6003338/2025
- Decision date
- 6 May 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Employment details
- Role
- Band 8a Medicines Optimisation Specialist Pharmacist
- Service
- 4 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister