Cases3202184/2023

Claimant v Luxtripper Ltd (in administration)

6 May 2025Before Employment Judge Mr G. KingLondon Eastremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£25,598

Individual claims

Failure to Inform & Consultsucceeded

The Respondent dismissed over 60 employees as redundant on 27 October 2023 without any prior consultation. No collective consultation took place, no employee representatives were elected, and there was no recognised trade union. The Respondent was required under s.188 TULRCA to consult at least 30 days before dismissals but failed entirely to do so. The Respondent did not establish special circumstances rendering consultation impracticable.

Failure to Inform & Consultsucceeded

The tribunal found the complaint under s.192 TULRCA well-founded. The Respondent failed to pay remuneration under the protective award granted by the tribunal. The Respondent, being in administration, has not paid the amounts due to the claimants under the 90-day protective award.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The First Claimant, Mr O'Byrne, was contractually entitled to four weeks' notice pay but only received two weeks. The tribunal accepted his evidence and found the claim for outstanding notice pay succeeded, though recovery is unlikely due to the Respondent being in administration.

Facts

Three employees of Luxtripper Ltd were dismissed on 27 October 2023 along with over 60 colleagues when the company failed to secure a sale by Accelerated Merger. The employees received no warning or consultation before immediate dismissal. The company subsequently entered administration and the Insolvency Service paid statutory entitlements including redundancy, holiday pay and partial notice pay.

Decision

The tribunal found the respondent failed entirely to comply with collective consultation duties under s.188 TULRCA, dismissing over 60 employees without consultation or electing employee representatives. A protective award of the maximum 90 days was granted due to the complete absence of mitigation or special circumstances. The tribunal also found the respondent failed to pay remuneration under the protective award and ordered payment, though recovery is unlikely due to insolvency.

Practical note

Where an employer completely fails to consult on collective redundancies and offers no explanation or mitigating circumstances, tribunals will award the maximum 90-day protective period starting from the dismissal date, following Susie Radin guidance.

Award breakdown

Notice pay£1,215

Legal authorities cited

Susie Radin Ltd v GMB [2004] ICR 893Harford v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry EAT 0313/07Independent Insurance Co Ltd v Aspinall [2011] ICR 1234

Statutes

TULRCA s.189TULRCA s.188TULRCA s.192TULRCA s.190

Case details

Case number
3202184/2023
Decision date
6 May 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
No