Cases1405862/2023

Claimant v Marshall Motor Group Limited

2 May 2025Before Employment Judge DawsonSouthamptonremote telephone

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Redundancy Paydismissed on withdrawal

The claimant withdrew the claim for redundancy payment and it was formally dismissed by the tribunal upon withdrawal.

Facts

Mr Grzybek brought a claim for redundancy payment against Marshall Motor Group Limited. The hearing was conducted in private by telephone. The claimant represented himself while the respondent was represented by Mr Simpson, a solicitor.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim for redundancy payment upon the claimant's withdrawal. This was a preliminary hearing conducted remotely by telephone, and no substantive determination was made on the merits of the claim.

Practical note

This case demonstrates the procedural mechanism for dismissing claims when a claimant chooses to withdraw, requiring no substantive findings on the merits.

Case details

Case number
1405862/2023
Decision date
2 May 2025
Hearing type
dismissal on withdrawal
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No