Cases2218640/2024

Claimant v Wolf Armouries Limited

2 May 2025Before Employment Judge P KlimovLondon Centralin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Holiday Paydismissed on withdrawal

The complaint in respect of holiday pay was withdrawn by the claimant and therefore dismissed pursuant to Rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal not well-founded and dismissed the claim, concluding that the dismissal was fair.

Wrongful Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay (wrongful dismissal) not well-founded and dismissed it, concluding the respondent was entitled to dismiss without notice.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's final wages with respect to the pay periods December 2023 and January 2024. However, the respondent was entitled to set off the sum deducted against money owed by the claimant to the respondent, resulting in no net award.

Facts

Mr Piddington was employed by Wolf Armouries Limited. The employment ended and he brought claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, holiday pay, and unauthorised deductions from wages relating to pay periods in December 2023 and January 2024. The respondent had failed to provide written statement of employment particulars.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the unfair and wrongful dismissal claims as not well-founded. While the unauthorised deductions claim succeeded, the respondent was entitled to set off the deducted amount against money owed by the claimant, resulting in no net award. The tribunal found exceptional circumstances made an award for failure to provide written particulars unjust and inequitable.

Practical note

A finding of unauthorised deduction from wages does not automatically result in a payment to the claimant where the employer has a valid contractual set-off against sums owed by the employee.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Act 2002 s.38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 51

Case details

Case number
2218640/2024
Decision date
2 May 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister