Claimant v Jaguar Landrover Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the complaint of direct race discrimination was not well-founded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing but not recorded in the written judgment document provided.
The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing but not recorded in the written judgment document provided.
Facts
Mukesh Pawar brought claims of direct race discrimination and unfair dismissal against his former employer Jaguar Landrover Limited. The case proceeded to a five-day full merits hearing before a three-person tribunal panel in the Midlands West region. Both parties were represented by counsel at the hearing.
Decision
The tribunal unanimously dismissed both the direct race discrimination complaint and the unfair dismissal complaint as not well-founded. Full reasons were given orally at the hearing but are not included in the written judgment document.
Practical note
Without written reasons, the specific legal or factual basis for the tribunal's rejection of both the race discrimination and unfair dismissal claims cannot be determined from this judgment.
Case details
- Case number
- 1305883/2023
- Decision date
- 2 May 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 5
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- manufacturing
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister