Cases3300020/2024

Claimant v Compass Group UK and Ireland Ltd

30 April 2025Before Employment Judge Suzanne PalmerBury St Edmundsin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The Tribunal found the Respondent held a genuine belief in the Claimant's guilt after a reasonable investigation. Food and cloths were found in the Claimant's bag with no plausible explanation. The decision to dismiss for theft fell within the band of reasonable responses open to the employer under the Burchell test.

Direct Discrimination(sexual orientation)failed

The Tribunal found no evidence of less favourable treatment. The comparators cited were not valid, and there was no evidence that the dismissal was in any way tainted by the Claimant's sexual orientation. The claim did not even get off the ground.

Facts

The Claimant was a domestic assistant at Addenbrooke's Hospital employed by Compass Group for 18 years. On 26 October 2023, the Housekeeping Manager found food trays and microfibre cloths in the Claimant's bag in an unlocked cupboard. The Claimant denied taking the items and suggested they were planted. After an investigation and disciplinary hearing, he was dismissed for gross misconduct (theft) on 11 November 2023. He appealed alleging homophobia but then withdrew his appeal.

Decision

The Tribunal dismissed both claims. The unfair dismissal claim failed because the Respondent held a genuine and reasonably held belief in the Claimant's guilt after a reasonable investigation, satisfying the Burchell test. The dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses. The direct discrimination claim failed as there was no evidence of less favourable treatment or that sexual orientation played any part in the dismissal.

Practical note

An employer can fairly dismiss for misconduct even if the employee's guilt is not definitively proven, provided the Burchell test is satisfied: genuine belief, reasonable investigation, and reasonably held belief in guilt.

Legal authorities cited

Madarassy v Nomura International Plc [2007] ICR 867BHS v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones [1983] ICR 17British Leyland (UK) Ltd v Swift [1981]

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.98EqA 2010 s.136EqA 2010 s.13

Case details

Case number
3300020/2024
Decision date
30 April 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Employment details

Role
Domestic Assistant
Service
19 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No