Cases1406255/2023

Claimant v Whiteley Village Veterinary Centre Limited

30 April 2025Before Employment Judge GraySouthamptonin person

Outcome

Partly successful£4,480

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)failed

The tribunal found that the claimant's dismissal was not because of something arising in consequence of her disability. The respondent's treatment was not discriminatory under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010.

Unfair Dismissalpartly succeeded

The tribunal found that the claimant was procedurally unfairly dismissed by the respondent. However, applying the Polkey principle, a fair dismissal would have occurred in any event, meaning no compensatory award was due.

Facts

The claimant was employed by Whiteley Village Veterinary Centre Limited. She brought claims for discrimination arising from disability and unfair dismissal. The tribunal heard evidence over three days at Southampton.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the discrimination claim, finding no section 15 discrimination. The unfair dismissal claim succeeded on procedural grounds, but with a 100% Polkey reduction, the claimant received only the basic award of £4,480 (7 weeks at £640 per week) and no compensatory award.

Practical note

A procedurally unfair dismissal can result in minimal compensation where the tribunal finds that a fair dismissal would have occurred in any event, justifying a 100% Polkey reduction.

Award breakdown

Basic award£4,480

Adjustments

Polkey reduction100%

100% Polkey reduction applied - tribunal found that a fair dismissal would have happened in any event, eliminating compensatory award entirely

Legal authorities cited

Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd [1988] ICR 142

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.15Employment Rights Act 1996 s.98

Case details

Case number
1406255/2023
Decision date
30 April 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister