Cases1402180/2024

Claimant v Sainsburys Supermarkets Ltd

30 April 2025Before Employment Judge SelfSouthamptonin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal found that the claim for unlawful deductions from wages was not well-founded. The claim failed on the merits and was dismissed by the tribunal.

Facts

The claimant, Mr C Bird, brought a claim against his employer Sainsburys Supermarkets Limited alleging unlawful deductions from his wages. The case was heard at Southampton Employment Tribunal on 30 April 2025 before Employment Judge Self. The claimant was represented by Dr R Bird as a lay representative, while the respondent was represented by counsel, Mr A Carter.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim, finding that it was not well-founded. The tribunal concluded that the respondent had not made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages.

Practical note

An unlawful deductions from wages claim against a major retailer failed on the merits, demonstrating the importance of establishing that wages were properly due and that a deduction actually occurred.

Case details

Case number
1402180/2024
Decision date
30 April 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep