Cases103890/2010

Claimant v City of Glasgow Council

29 April 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue the claim. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal order of 19 February 2025 requiring written reasons by 16 April 2025 or request for hearing, and provided no acceptable reason why claim should not be struck out.

Facts

The claimant Miss D Meek brought a claim against City of Glasgow Council. On 19 February 2025, the tribunal issued an unless order requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 16 April 2025 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this order and provided no acceptable reason or hearing request.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant's failure to respond to the unless order demonstrated non-pursuit of the claim.

Practical note

Failure to comply with tribunal unless orders regarding active pursuit of a claim will result in strike-out, even for unrepresented claimants.

Case details

Case number
103890/2010
Decision date
29 April 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
public sector
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No