Claimant v Cordia Services LLP
Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for non-pursuit after claimant failed to respond to tribunal's unless order requiring written reasons by 17 April 2025 or to request a hearing.
Facts
Ms Duncan brought a claim against Cordia Services LLP and Glasgow City Council. On 27 March 2025, the tribunal issued an unless order requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 17 April 2025 or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond to this order or request a hearing.
Decision
The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued, as the claimant failed to comply with the unless order and provided no acceptable reason or requested a hearing.
Practical note
Failure to respond to an unless order requiring reasons why a claim should not be struck out will result in the claim being struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 4111728/2018
- Decision date
- 29 April 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No