Cases4104449/2017

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

29 April 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for non-pursuit. The claimant was given until 12 March 2025 to provide written reasons or request a hearing to oppose the strike-out but failed to provide an acceptable reason or to engage with the tribunal process.

Facts

Ms G Stewart brought a claim against Glasgow City Council. On 26 February 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 12 March 2025 as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit, or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or engage with the tribunal's directions.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason opposing the strike-out or to request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must actively engage with tribunal directions and unless orders or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit, even without a hearing.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4104449/2017
Decision date
29 April 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No