Claimant v Boots Management Services Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that at the relevant times the claimant was not a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of Dyslexia. Without establishing disabled status, the claim for unfavourable treatment arising from disability could not succeed.
The tribunal found that at the relevant times the claimant was not a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of Dyslexia. Without establishing disabled status, the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments could not succeed.
The tribunal found that at the relevant times the claimant was not a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of Dyslexia. Without establishing disabled status, the claim for harassment relating to disability could not succeed.
The tribunal found that at the relevant times the claimant was not a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of Dyslexia. Without establishing disabled status, the claim for victimisation relating to disability could not succeed.
Facts
Mr Benham brought claims against Boots Management Services Ltd alleging disability discrimination related to Dyslexia. This was a preliminary hearing to determine whether the claimant met the statutory definition of disability. The claimant was assisted by Ms Banham, and the respondent was represented by counsel Ms Nichols.
Decision
The tribunal found that at the relevant times the claimant was not a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of Dyslexia. As a result, all disability-related claims including unfavourable treatment, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment, and victimisation were dismissed.
Practical note
A claimant must establish disabled status under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 as a threshold issue before any disability discrimination claims can succeed.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3308088/2023
- Decision date
- 29 April 2025
- Hearing type
- preliminary
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- retail
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep