Claimant v London Ambulance Service NHS Trust

The tribunal found the respondent made every effort to accommodate the claimant's requests and provided support. The supportive meeting on 27 July 2022 regarding return to work could not justify resignation. The respondent's actions were not taken without just cause or good reason. The claimant had been supported throughout. No fundamental breach of contract was established, taken individually or cumulatively.

Tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. She failed to provide evidence of substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities (only provided impact on work activities). Even if she had been disabled, most claims were out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. The only in-time claim (Apple Pen provision) was not well-founded as the adjustment had been accepted and was planned to be implemented following the Workplace Needs Assessment on 15 June 2022.

Multiple reasonable adjustment claims (based at Canton from January 2020, induction September 2019, returning to Canton July 2021, questions in advance of BSM interview June 2021, retaining laptop during CTM training September 2021, additional support during CTM training, provision of EPCR training from January 2022, alternative room for IRO exam March 2022) were struck out as out of time, with tribunal finding it was not just and equitable to extend time. The claimant provided no good reason why time should be extended.