Cases1806606/2023

Claimant v [XX] University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£57,502

Individual claims

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)succeeded

The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide auxiliary aids as a reasonable adjustment for the claimant's disability. This resulted in injury to feelings warranting compensation.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)succeeded

The tribunal found discrimination under Section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 arising from the respondent's withdrawal of an offer. This constituted unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability.

Facts

This is a remedy judgment following liability findings in favour of the claimant. The claimant succeeded in claims of disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found two separate acts of discrimination: failure to provide auxiliary aids as a reasonable adjustment, and Section 15 discrimination relating to the withdrawal of an offer.

Decision

The tribunal awarded no pecuniary loss. It awarded £18,000 for injury to feelings for the auxiliary aid failure and £25,000 for the Section 15 offer withdrawal discrimination. Aggravated damages of £2,000 were awarded. A 10% ACAS uplift was applied to all awards. Interest totalling £8,002 was awarded. The total award was £57,502.

Practical note

NHS trusts must ensure reasonable adjustments are implemented and avoid discrimination in recruitment processes, as failure can result in substantial injury to feelings awards with ACAS uplifts and interest.

Award breakdown

Injury to feelings£43,000
Interest£8,002

Vento band: middle

Adjustments

ACAS uplift+10%

ACAS uplift of 10% applied to injury to feelings awards and aggravated damages for failure to follow ACAS Code

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.119Equality Act 2010 s.124Equality Act 2010 s.15

Case details

Case number
1806606/2023
Decision date
28 April 2025
Hearing type
remedy
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister