Cases2221249/2024

Claimant v ISS Mediclean Ltd T/A ISS Facility Services Healthcare

28 April 2025Before Employment Judge WattonLondon Centralin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the reason for dismissal was conduct (gross misconduct). The respondent genuinely believed the claimant had committed gross misconduct (confronting a student physiotherapist publicly about menstrual blood and following her into an office causing distress), had reasonable grounds for that belief, conducted a reasonable investigation, acted procedurally fairly, and dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses given the claimant was already on a final written warning and gave little account of events until two days before the hearing.

Breach of Contractfailed

The tribunal found the claimant was guilty of conduct so serious that the respondent was entitled to dismiss without notice. The claimant followed a student and continued to berate her publicly about menstrual blood in a hospital setting, which constituted intimidating behaviour causing anxiety. This crossed the threshold for summary dismissal.

Holiday Paydismissed on withdrawal

The parties agreed at hearing that the respondent had paid the outstanding holiday pay of £419.40 gross (£321.41 net) in July 2024. The relevant payslip was in the tribunal bundle at page 320.

Facts

The claimant was a domestic assistant employed by ISS at the Royal Marsden Hospital. She was dismissed for gross misconduct on 5 February 2024 after an incident on 14 December 2023 where she confronted a student physiotherapist about not flushing a toilet containing menstrual blood, then followed the student into the physiotherapy office and continued the confrontation publicly, causing the student to be sent home distressed. The claimant initially said she could not remember the incident, then denied it, only providing her own account two days before the hearing.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed all claims. The dismissal was fair: the respondent genuinely believed the claimant committed gross misconduct, had reasonable grounds following a reasonable investigation, acted procedurally fairly including at appeal, and dismissal was within the reasonable range of responses. The claimant was guilty of conduct serious enough to warrant summary dismissal. The holiday pay claim was dismissed as agreed paid.

Practical note

An employer can fairly dismiss for gross misconduct where an employee engages in public intimidating behaviour towards another person in a hospital setting, even if a single incident, particularly where the employee is on a final written warning and provides no credible alternative account during the disciplinary process.

Legal authorities cited

Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones [1983] ICR 17Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti [2019] UKSC 55Taylor v OCS Group Ltd [2006] IRLR 613Brito-Babapulle v Ealing Hospital NHS Trust [2013] IRLR 854Dada v Metal Box Co Ltd [1974] ICR 559BHS v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Hitt [2003] ICR 111

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.95ERA 1996 s.98ERA 1996 s.98(2)ERA 1996 s.94ERA 1996 s.98(4)ERA 1996 s.103A

Case details

Case number
2221249/2024
Decision date
28 April 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Domestic Assistant

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep