Claimant v ISS Mediclean Ltd T/A ISS Facility Services Healthcare
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the reason for dismissal was conduct (gross misconduct). The respondent genuinely believed the claimant had committed gross misconduct (confronting a student physiotherapist publicly about menstrual blood and following her into an office causing distress), had reasonable grounds for that belief, conducted a reasonable investigation, acted procedurally fairly, and dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses given the claimant was already on a final written warning and gave little account of events until two days before the hearing.
The tribunal found the claimant was guilty of conduct so serious that the respondent was entitled to dismiss without notice. The claimant followed a student and continued to berate her publicly about menstrual blood in a hospital setting, which constituted intimidating behaviour causing anxiety. This crossed the threshold for summary dismissal.
The parties agreed at hearing that the respondent had paid the outstanding holiday pay of £419.40 gross (£321.41 net) in July 2024. The relevant payslip was in the tribunal bundle at page 320.
Facts
The claimant was a domestic assistant employed by ISS at the Royal Marsden Hospital. She was dismissed for gross misconduct on 5 February 2024 after an incident on 14 December 2023 where she confronted a student physiotherapist about not flushing a toilet containing menstrual blood, then followed the student into the physiotherapy office and continued the confrontation publicly, causing the student to be sent home distressed. The claimant initially said she could not remember the incident, then denied it, only providing her own account two days before the hearing.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed all claims. The dismissal was fair: the respondent genuinely believed the claimant committed gross misconduct, had reasonable grounds following a reasonable investigation, acted procedurally fairly including at appeal, and dismissal was within the reasonable range of responses. The claimant was guilty of conduct serious enough to warrant summary dismissal. The holiday pay claim was dismissed as agreed paid.
Practical note
An employer can fairly dismiss for gross misconduct where an employee engages in public intimidating behaviour towards another person in a hospital setting, even if a single incident, particularly where the employee is on a final written warning and provides no credible alternative account during the disciplinary process.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2221249/2024
- Decision date
- 28 April 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Employment details
- Role
- Domestic Assistant
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep