Cases2206705/2021

Claimant v Mr S Jibara

25 April 2025Before Employment Judge KhanLondon Centralhybrid

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£14,246

Individual claims

Harassment(race)succeeded

The Tribunal found that Mr Jibara made comments during a fact-finding interview on 14 August 2020 that were patently related to the claimant's race, unwanted, and had the proscribed effect of violating the claimant's dignity and creating a degrading, humiliating and/or offensive environment. The comments linked the claimant's alleged problematic conduct (shouting, violence) to his Algerian nationality and Bedouin character.

Facts

The claimant, a journalist at BBC Arabic, was subject to a fact-finding investigation in August 2020. During this investigation, Mr Jibara made comments linking the claimant's alleged problematic conduct to his Algerian nationality and Bedouin character. The claimant became aware of these comments in November 2020 and was deeply distressed, perceiving them as racist and part of a campaign by managers to remove him. The respondent failed to uphold the claimant's harassment complaint internally, applying an incorrect definition of harassment. The claimant had been subject to numerous disciplinary and grievance processes since 2017.

Decision

The Tribunal awarded £10,500 for injury to feelings at the bottom of the middle Vento band plus interest of £3,746.40. The Tribunal found Mr Jibara's comments had a significant and lasting impact on the claimant, violating his dignity and creating a degrading environment. No award was made for personal injury as the Tribunal found the comments did not materially contribute to the claimant's mental or physical health issues, which were primarily caused by ongoing work stresses and family pressures. No recommendations were made.

Practical note

Tribunals must focus on the actual injury suffered by the claimant when assessing injury to feelings awards, and employers investigating harassment complaints must correctly apply the legal definition, giving equal weight to the effect on the complainant as to the alleged perpetrator's intention.

Award breakdown

Injury to feelings£10,500
Interest£3,746

Vento band: middle

Legal authorities cited

Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2003] ICR 318Ministry of Defence v Cannock [1994] IRLR 509Essa v Laing Ltd [2004] ICR 746Olayemi v Athena Medical Centre [2016] 1074Sheriff v Klyne Tugs (Lowestoft) Ltd [1999] ICR 1170British Telecommunications plc v Reid [2004] IRLR 327Komeng v Creative Support Ltd UKEAT/0275/18Eddie Stobart Limited v Graham [2025] EAT 14Chagger v Abbey National Plc [2010] ICR 397Armitage, Marsden and HM Prison Service v Johnson [1997] IRLR 162

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.124(2)Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996Equality Act 2010 s.124(3)Equality Act 2010 s.119(3)Equality Act 2010 s.124(6)

Case details

Case number
2206705/2021
Decision date
25 April 2025
Hearing type
remedy
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
journalist

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister