Cases2303207/2023

Claimant v Stopwatch UK

25 April 2025Before Employment Judge AbbottLondon Southon papers

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)not determined

This was a costs judgment following refusal of an application to amend to add a section 15 Equality Act (discrimination arising from disability) claim. The amendment application was refused on 8 November 2024 due to balance of hardship factors including late timing, time limit issues, and prejudice to respondent. The underlying claims remain to be determined at final hearing.

Facts

This is a costs judgment following the tribunal's refusal on 8 November 2024 of the claimant's application to amend her claim to add a complaint of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010. The claimant had been represented by solicitors since March 2024 but only brought the amendment application 5 months later, after all preparations for the final hearing had been completed. The application was made more than 15 months after the claimant left employment, creating time limit issues. The respondent is a charity.

Decision

The tribunal ordered the claimant to pay costs of £1,750 to the respondent under Rule 76. The tribunal found the claimant acted unreasonably in pursuing the amendment application which was without merit, given the clear balance of hardship against allowing it (late timing, expansion of factual enquiry, time limits, prejudice to respondent charity, and claimant having other live claims). The respondent had claimed £2,100 but the tribunal reduced this to £1,750 as reasonable and proportionate.

Practical note

Late applications to amend that would significantly expand the scope of proceedings after preparations are complete, particularly where there are time limit issues and other claims remain live, risk costs orders even against represented claimants.

Legal authorities cited

Yerrakalva v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council [2012] ICR 420

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 76Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 84Equality Act 2010 s.15Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 78

Case details

Case number
2303207/2023
Decision date
25 April 2025
Hearing type
costs
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
charity
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No