Cases2305023/2024

Claimant v Regency Law Possessions Ltd

25 April 2025Before Employment Judge EmeryLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£4,043

Individual claims

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay pension contributions for the period October 2018 to April 2024 as required under the employment contract. This constituted a breach of contract for which the claimant was entitled to compensation of £1,792.50.

Redundancy Paysucceeded

Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, it was agreed by both parties that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £1,875.00 based on her length of service and weekly pay.

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the dismissal was procedurally unfair. The respondent failed to undertake a proper redundancy process which would have taken approximately two weeks. The claimant succeeded in establishing the dismissal was unfair under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Facts

Ms Massingham was employed by Regency Law Possessions Ltd and was dismissed by reason of redundancy in April 2024. The respondent failed to pay pension contributions from October 2018 to April 2024 as required under her contract. The dismissal was effected without following a proper redundancy consultation process.

Decision

The tribunal found in favour of the claimant on all claims. The respondent breached contract by failing to pay pension contributions (£1,792.50), owed statutory redundancy pay (£1,875.00), and unfairly dismissed the claimant by failing to follow a proper redundancy procedure which would have taken approximately two weeks (compensatory award £375.00).

Practical note

Employers must follow proper redundancy procedures even in small businesses, and failure to pay contractual pension contributions constitutes a recoverable breach of contract.

Award breakdown

Compensatory award£375
Redundancy pay£1,875
Pension loss£1,793

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.163

Case details

Case number
2305023/2024
Decision date
25 April 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
legal services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep