Cases2401720/2023

Claimant v AstraZeneca UK Limited

25 April 2025Before Regional Employment Judge FraneyMidlands Weston papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under Rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. The tribunal wrote to the personal representatives on 7 November 2024 and 6 January 2025 giving opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but no reply was received.

Facts

A claim was brought by the personal representatives of the late Mrs N Holden against AstraZeneca UK Limited. The tribunal wrote to the personal representatives on 7 November 2024 and again on 6 January 2025 giving them opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. No reply was received to either letter.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The personal representatives failed to respond to the tribunal's letters despite being given two opportunities to engage with the proceedings.

Practical note

Personal representatives pursuing claims on behalf of deceased claimants must actively engage with tribunal correspondence or risk having the claim struck out for non-pursuit, even in sensitive circumstances involving a death.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
2401720/2023
Decision date
25 April 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No