Cases4100572/2025

Claimant v EMG Scotland Limited

25 April 2025Before Employment Judge P O'DonnellScotlandin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Automatic Unfair Dismissalnot determined

This was an interim relief application under s161 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal refused the application, finding the claimant was not likely to succeed in showing he was constructively dismissed or that the principal reason for any dismissal was making use of trade union services. The tribunal found the employer's conduct did not meet the Malik test for breach of trust and confidence, and that different reasons were alleged for different aspects of the employer's conduct, meaning the principal reason was unlikely to be trade union related.

Constructive Dismissalnot determined

The claimant alleged constructive dismissal based on a series of events from October 2024 to March 2025, including emails raising work issues and the employer's refusal to communicate with his trade union representative. The tribunal found the claimant was not likely to prove the Malik test for breach of the implied term of trust and confidence was met. The employer was entitled to raise work issues and was not legally obliged to communicate with the union representative or allow them to attend non-disciplinary meetings.

Interim Relieffailed

The tribunal refused the application for interim relief, finding the claimant had not shown it was 'likely' (meaning a pretty good chance of success) that his claims would succeed at a full hearing. The tribunal was not satisfied the claimant could prove he was dismissed or that the principal reason was trade union activity.

Facts

The claimant resigned and claimed automatic unfair dismissal under s152 of the 1992 Act, alleging he was constructively dismissed for making use of trade union services. He relied on conduct from October 2024 to March 2025, including emails from management raising work issues and the employer's refusal to communicate directly with his union representative or allow them to attend welfare meetings. The claimant had previously disclosed a disability and there had been earlier workplace issues including proposed office closure and concerns about workload.

Decision

The tribunal refused the interim relief application. The tribunal found the claimant was not likely to prove constructive dismissal because the employer's conduct did not meet the Malik test for breach of trust and confidence. The employer was entitled to raise work issues and was not obliged to communicate with the union. Even if there was a dismissal, the claimant was unlikely to prove the principal reason was trade union activity, as different reasons were alleged for different aspects of the conduct and some events predated his union involvement.

Practical note

Interim relief applications under s161 face a high threshold: an employer's refusal to engage with a union representative does not itself breach the implied term of trust and confidence, and in 'last straw' cases the principal reason for dismissal must be identified across all the allegedly repudiatory conduct, not just the final act.

Legal authorities cited

Lewis v Motorworld Garages Ltd [1985] IRLR 465Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd [2008] ICR 799Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International [1998] AC 20Berriman v Delabole Slate Ltd [1985] ICR 546Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust [2018] IRLR 833Taplin v C Shippam Ltd [1978] IRLR 450Ministry of Justice v Sarfraz [2011] IRLR 562Hancock v Ter-Berg [2020] IRLR 97Western Excavating v Sharp [1978] ICR 221

Statutes

Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.152Employment Rights Act 1996 s.95(1)(c)Employment Rights Act 1996 s.128Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.146Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.161

Case details

Case number
4100572/2025
Decision date
25 April 2025
Hearing type
interim
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
union