Cases2602039/2024

Claimant v Dermal Diagnostics Limited

24 April 2025Before Employment Judge Victoria ButlerMidlands Easton papers

Outcome

Default judgment£2,100

Individual claims

Redundancy Paysucceeded

The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal made a determination under rule 21 and awarded the claimant a redundancy payment.

Facts

The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy by Dermal Diagnostics Limited. The claim was filed on 10 December 2024 in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal. The respondent failed to present a valid response within the required time limit.

Decision

Employment Judge Victoria Butler made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on papers without a hearing. The tribunal awarded the claimant a redundancy payment of £2,100.

Practical note

Where a respondent fails to enter a timely response, the tribunal may determine the claim on paper under rule 21 and award appropriate statutory redundancy pay.

Award breakdown

Redundancy pay£2,100

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure rule 21

Case details

Case number
2602039/2024
Decision date
24 April 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No