Claimant v The White Horse Federation
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard evidence over two days and concluded that the claimant's dismissal was fair. The claim was not well founded and was dismissed.
Facts
Mark Fletcher brought an unfair dismissal claim against The White Horse Federation, an education sector employer. The claimant applied for a privacy order under rule 49 which was refused. The case proceeded to a full merits hearing over two days conducted remotely by video.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim, finding it was not well founded. The claimant was represented by a lay representative while the respondent was represented by counsel. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Practical note
The tribunal found the dismissal to be fair following a two-day hearing, with the claim being dismissed in its entirety.
Case details
- Case number
- 1400508/2024
- Decision date
- 24 April 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- education
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep