Cases1401704/2024

Claimant v T & G Woodware Limited

24 April 2025Before Employment Judge MidgleyBristolremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds

Individual claims

Failure to Inform & Consultsucceeded

The tribunal found the claims for a protective award well founded. The First Respondent wholly failed to inform or consult its employees as required under collective redundancy consultation obligations and offered no explanation for that failure. The tribunal considered this a serious default justifying the maximum 90-day award.

Facts

T & G Woodware Limited entered creditors voluntary liquidation and made 17 employees redundant on or around 31 May 2024. The First Respondent wholly failed to inform or consult with affected employees about the collective redundancy as required by law. Neither respondent attended the tribunal hearing. The claimants appeared in person.

Decision

The tribunal found the claims for protective awards well founded and awarded the maximum 90-day period beginning 31 May 2024. The tribunal considered it just and equitable to award the maximum because of the seriousness of the default—the complete failure to inform or consult—and the absence of any explanation from the respondent. Other claims were dismissed on withdrawal.

Practical note

Complete failure to comply with collective redundancy consultation obligations where an employer offers no explanation will result in the maximum 90-day protective award.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

TULRCA 1992 s.188

Case details

Case number
1401704/2024
Decision date
24 April 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No