Cases6006250/2023

Claimant v Wessex Water Services Limited

16 April 2025Before Employment Judge N J Roperremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(age)withdrawn

The claimant withdrew this claim on 18 October 2024, explaining he wanted to return to work with a new line manager and felt reassured that managers he alleged caused detriment had been redeployed. The claim was dismissed on withdrawal.

Whistleblowingwithdrawn

The claimant alleged detriment arising from protected public interest disclosures, including extension of probationary period and alleged bullying. The claim was withdrawn on 18 October 2024 for the same reasons as the discrimination claim.

Facts

Claimant commenced employment in 2023 and was subject to probation. Complaints of bullying were made against him; he raised a grievance which was not upheld. He went on sick leave and filed tribunal claims for age discrimination and whistleblowing detriment in December 2023. He sought postponement of a preliminary hearing citing ill health, though the real reason was a clash with another tribunal hearing. He withdrew his claims in October 2024. Respondent applied for costs of £405 relating to the misleading postponement request.

Decision

The tribunal refused the respondent's costs application. While finding the claimant acted unreasonably in not disclosing the real reason for the postponement request, the judge exercised discretion not to award costs because the postponement would likely have been granted anyway, it was not a late application, and the respondent was not prejudiced. The withdrawal itself was not found to be unreasonable.

Practical note

Even where unreasonable conduct is found, tribunals retain broad discretion on costs and will consider whether the receiving party actually suffered prejudice or incurred additional costs as a result of the conduct.

Legal authorities cited

Gee v Shell UK Ltd [2003] IRLR 82Dyer v SS Employment EAT 183/88Monaghan v Close Thornton [2002] EAT/0003/01Brooks v Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust [2019] UKEAT/0246/18NPower Yorkshire Ltd v Daley EAT/0842/04Radia v Jefferies International Ltd [2020] IRLR 431 EATArrowsmith v Nottingham Trent University [2011] ICR 159 CAAQ Ltd v Holden [2012] IRLR 648 EATKapoor v Governing Body of Barnhill Community High School UKEAT/0352/13Barnsley BC v Yerrakalva [2012] IRLR 78 CAMcPherson v BNP Paribas [2004] ICR 1398 CA

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 76Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 82Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 75Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 74

Case details

Case number
6006250/2023
Decision date
16 April 2025
Hearing type
costs
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
energy
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Claimant representation

Represented
No