Cases3311126/2024

Claimant v Philip Stanton

14 April 2025Before Employment Judge Hutchingson papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant did not have the required two years continuous service under s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The claim was struck out for lack of jurisdiction as the claimant was employed for less than two years.

Facts

Miss Johnson was employed by Philip Stanton for less than two years. She brought a claim for unfair dismissal along with other unspecified complaints. The claimant was given the opportunity to explain why the unfair dismissal claim should not be struck out but failed to provide an acceptable reason.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint on jurisdictional grounds because the claimant did not have the required two years continuous employment under s.108 ERA 1996. The claimant's other complaints remain unaffected by this judgment.

Practical note

Unfair dismissal claims require two years continuous service, and claims lacking this qualifying period will be struck out for lack of jurisdiction regardless of the merits.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
3311126/2024
Decision date
14 April 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No