Cases3307768/2023

Claimant v Elysium Healthcare Limited

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's letter dated 13 February 2025 which gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Mrs K Inaba brought a claim against Elysium Healthcare Limited. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 13 February 2025 giving her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond or make any sufficient representations.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given notice and an opportunity to respond but failed to do so. The decision was made on the papers without a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal correspondence, or risk having their claim struck out for non-pursuit even without a hearing.

Case details

Case number
3307768/2023
Decision date
14 April 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No