Claimant v Total Clean Services Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the respondent had reasonable and proper cause for its conduct. The respondent followed its own proper procedures in handling the theft accusation, conducted a fair investigation, accepted the claimant's version of events, and offered alternative work at other client premises. The claimant failed to show that the respondent conducted itself in a manner calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of trust and confidence.
Facts
The claimant worked as a cleaner for the respondent agency from February 2019 to September 2024. After reporting suspicious circumstances regarding security tags to a client manager, the client accused him of theft based on CCTV footage and items found in bins and his locker. The respondent suspended him, conducted an investigation including two meetings, decided not to proceed to disciplinary action and accepted the claimant's version of events. However, the client exercised its contractual right to exclude the claimant from its premises, and the respondent offered alternative work at other locations. The claimant resigned, feeling disrespected by the investigation process.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the constructive dismissal claim, finding that the respondent had followed proper procedures, conducted a fair investigation, and had reasonable and proper cause for its conduct. The respondent accepted the claimant's version of events, offered alternative work, and even paid two weeks' extra pay as a goodwill gesture. The claimant failed to establish a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.
Practical note
An employer does not breach the implied term of trust and confidence by conducting a proper investigation into theft allegations, even where the employee has an unblemished record, provided it follows fair procedures and offers reasonable alternatives when a client exercises contractual exclusion rights.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2225877/2024
- Decision date
- 13 April 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- professional services
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Employment details
- Role
- cleaner
- Service
- 6 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep